Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 1987No. M-66704 (86-347); CA A42103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

The state appeals, contending that the trial court erred in dismissing its theft complaint. See ORS 135.755. 1 We agree and reverse.

The facts are essentially uncontradicted. Defendant was suspected of shoplifting from a department store. Hikade, a store security guard, saw her in the store with a necktie in her hand, then saw her leave the store. The necktie was not found in the area where she had been observed. Hikade and Debaw, another store security guard, contacted her outside the store at about 1:40 p.m. They identified themselves as security guards and asked her to accompany them back…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Delp v. Zapp's Drug & Variety StoresOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. SwettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
  5. State v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API