Legal Opinion

Pacific Express Co. v. Dunn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1891No. 7039PublishedCited by 29 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

Appellee brought this action to recover damages for the destruction of a house and property therein by fire, which he alleges resulted from the negligence of an employe of appellant while engaged in the course of his employment in its business. In the course of the trial appellee was permitted to prove his ownership of the house by his own testimony, and it is urged that such evidence was not admissible for that purpose.

His evidence was to the effect that he owned the house and lot on which it stood, and was in possession of it at the time and before it was destroyed;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PalmerTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Barger v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Bledsoe v. SimmsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Lea v. HernandezTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Yates v. . YatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Land v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Watkins v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CusenberryTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Reiter v. Coastal States Gas Producing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Conley v. Daughters of the Republic of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API