Legal Opinion

Murray v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1931No. Docket No. 6547PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by certain livestock of his shipped over the lines of defendant from Gordon, California, to Hynes, California. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1250 and from the judgment entered thereon the defendant appealed.

The complaint alleges and the amended answer admits that the plaintiff delivered to defendant as common carrier, and defendant so received at Gordon, California, “certain ordinary livestock known as stock…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Donlon Bros. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Olcovich v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Muelder v. Western Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Rosenauer v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Tatone v. Chin BingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. McQueen v. TylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. W. C. Cook & Co. v. White Truck & Transfer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API