Critchfield & Co. v. Armour
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley
On July 5, 1917, plaintiff commenced a first-class action in assumpsit in the municipal court of Chicago against the above-named defendants, as officers, directors and agents of the Tireoid Company, a corporation for profit organized under the laws of the State of Maine. Other parties were originally made codefendants, but the action was dismissed as to them, Following a trial without a jury the court, on March 22, 1922, found the issues against the defendants, assessed plaintiff’s damages at $15,710.50, and entered judgment in that amount against them and they appealed.
It is alleged in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Loverin v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Bigelow v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- American Amusement Co v. East Lake Chutes Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Soap Co. v. BogueOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- McAteer v. Menzel Building Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Van Ameringen v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
- American Soap Co. v. Bogue, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1924