Legal Opinion

Critchfield & Co. v. Armour

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1923No. Gen. No. 27,860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley

On July 5, 1917, plaintiff commenced a first-class action in assumpsit in the municipal court of Chicago against the above-named defendants, as officers, directors and agents of the Tireoid Company, a corporation for profit organized under the laws of the State of Maine. Other parties were originally made codefendants, but the action was dismissed as to them, Following a trial without a jury the court, on March 22, 1922, found the issues against the defendants, assessed plaintiff’s damages at $15,710.50, and entered judgment in that amount against them and they appealed.

It is alleged in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Loverin v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Bigelow v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. American Amusement Co v. East Lake Chutes Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Soap Co. v. BogueOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McAteer v. Menzel Building Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Van Ameringen v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  4. American Soap Co. v. Bogue, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API