Legal Opinion

Beller v. Rolfe

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2008No. 20060641PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

1 1 In this appeal we take up the question of whether the exclusionary rule applies to driver license suspension proceedings. We hold that it does not. Curtis Beller, whom police stopped on noise and light ordinance violations and subsequently arrested for operating his motorcycle while under the influence of alcohol, challenges the loss of his driving privileges. Mr. Beller contends that law enforcement lacked a sufficient justification to stop him, and therefore, the exelusion-ary rule should bar the State from admitting in proceedings before the Utah Driver License…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. TopanotesUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Bernat v. AllphinUtah Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beylund v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Francen v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. Miller v. TolerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Roark v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor VehiclesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Francen v. Colo. Dep't of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API