Legal Opinion

People v. Lepine

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1989No. D008908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

The issue before us is whether in a prosecution for driving a vehicle with a blood alcohol level of 0.10 percent or greater (Veh. Code, 1 § 23152, subd. (b)), the partition or conversion ratio defined by the California Code of Regulations for converting a breath alcohol percentage to a blood alcohol percentage may only be rebutted by the defense demonstrating the defendant had a partition ratio different than that presumed by the code. We conclude the defense is not so restricted and hold general evidence may be offered concerning partition ratio variability.

I

Background

Section…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Romano v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. MontalvoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. BurlingNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. McNealCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. BransfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. VangelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. IrelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. GustafsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API