People v. Lepine
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
The issue before us is whether in a prosecution for driving a vehicle with a blood alcohol level of 0.10 percent or greater (Veh. Code, 1 § 23152, subd. (b)), the partition or conversion ratio defined by the California Code of Regulations for converting a breath alcohol percentage to a blood alcohol percentage may only be rebutted by the defense demonstrating the defendant had a partition ratio different than that presumed by the code. We conclude the defense is not so restricted and hold general evidence may be offered concerning partition ratio variability.
I
Background
Section…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Romano v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. MontalvoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BurlingNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. McNealCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. BransfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. VangelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. IrelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. GustafsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.