Legal Opinion

State v. Harding

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1974No. 6747PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The State has charged the defendant with the illegal sale on July 26, 1973, of three allegedly obscene magazines entitled “Foul Play No. Two”, “Dr. Dikter and the Les” and “Savage” and one allegedly obscene book entitled “Girls Who Seduce Dogs.” The defendant filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the obscenity statute (RSA 57l-A:2 (Supp. 1972)) was unconstitutional in view of Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), and other related Supreme Court cases. The Trial Court (Harkaway, J.) reserved and transferred without ruling the following questions:

“1. Is RSA 57l-A:2 (Supp. 1972)…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. People v. NeumayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. ManzoHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mangum v. Maryland State Board of CensorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. State v. MOTION PICTURE ENTITLED" THE BET"Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API