Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Grangers' Business Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1931No. Docket No. 7640PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

The operator of a public warehouse, engaged in warehousing, cleaning and storing grain for shippers, appeals from a judgment in favor of a common carrier for demurrage on cars consigned to such shippers in its care. This judgment is based upon the following agreement between the parties: “Being fully acquainted with the terms ... of the average basis for settling for detention to cars as set forth in . . . the car demurrage rules . . . and being desirous of availing ourselves of this alternate method of settlement . . . we . . . agree ... (1) that with respect to all cars .…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Tidewater Coal Exch.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Firestone v. WahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Roberts v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. City of New Orleans ex rel. Public Belt Railroad Commission v. Hansen & Tidemann, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
  5. Philadelphia Belt Line Railroad v. Holt Hauling & Warehouse Systems, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API