Southern Pacific Co. v. Grangers' Business Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
The operator of a public warehouse, engaged in warehousing, cleaning and storing grain for shippers, appeals from a judgment in favor of a common carrier for demurrage on cars consigned to such shippers in its care. This judgment is based upon the following agreement between the parties: “Being fully acquainted with the terms ... of the average basis for settling for detention to cars as set forth in . . . the car demurrage rules . . . and being desirous of availing ourselves of this alternate method of settlement . . . we . . . agree ... (1) that with respect to all cars .…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Tidewater Coal Exch.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Butler v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Firestone v. WahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Roberts v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- City of New Orleans ex rel. Public Belt Railroad Commission v. Hansen & Tidemann, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
- Philadelphia Belt Line Railroad v. Holt Hauling & Warehouse Systems, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1972