Legal Opinion

State v. Lucas

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 27, 2020No. 120510Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 120,510 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. LARRY L. LUCAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Statutory interpretation is a legal question over which appellate courts exercise unlimited review. The aim of statutory interpretation is to determine the legislature's intent based on the language it employed. When a statute's text is plain and unambiguous, courts apply that language as written and do not look to canons of construction or legislative history. Courts give common words their common meanings and neither add language to statutes nor delete…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Cross v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API