Legal Opinion
Curtis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 29, 1944No. A-10238PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.
Defendant, Norman Y. Curtis, was charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county with the crime of engaging in the practice of dentistry without first obtaining a license from the State Board of Dentistry; was tried, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $250, and costs, and has appealed.
This prosecution was instituted under Tit. 59 O. S. A. 1941 § 271, the pertinent portion of which is as follows:
“Any person shall be regarded as practicing dentistry within the meaning of this Act who shall hold himself out, or employ methods, in any way, representing himself as being engaged in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Helvering v. Inter-Mountain Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Curtis v. Registered Dentists of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Lasdon v. HallihanIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- Haines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Shewmaker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
- Maloney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Perlow v. Board of Dental ExaminersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.