Cheek v. Cicero Smith Lbr. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
In the trial court, defendant in error, Cicero Smith Lumber Company, was plaintiff, and Roy Cheek, plaintiff in error, was defendant. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff’s action against defendant is to recover a money judgment on a promissory note executed by defendant and payable to plaintiff.
In addition to the usual allegations stating the cause of action, there is alleged in plaintiff’s petition that the note had been assessed for taxation and that the taxes levied thereon had been paid, which allegations are required by 68 O.S. 1941 §1515.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Day & Whitt Furniture Co. v. Welbilt Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Waters v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Williams v. J. F. Ball Bros. LumberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Farr v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of Friedman v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1989