Myiow v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Tom, J.R,
dissents in a memorandum as follows: Because plaintiff failed to “adduce proof sufficient to create a question of fact regarding whether his fall resulted from the lack of a safety device,” or identify any safety device that could have prevented the accident, his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim should be dismissed (Berg v Albany Ladder Co., Inc., 10 NY3d 902, 904 [2008]). Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
According to plaintiff, an employee of nonparty Brooklyn Welding Corp., he was tasked with moving steel beams that had been brought to Harlem Hospital for construction of a new patient…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Narducci v. Manhasset Bay AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Ayotte v. GervasioNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ortiz v. Varsity Holdings, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.