Legal Opinion · Dissent

Myiow v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 2016No. 388 117913/09Published

1Dissent

Tom, J.R,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: Because plaintiff failed to “adduce proof sufficient to create a question of fact regarding whether his fall resulted from the lack of a safety device,” or identify any safety device that could have prevented the accident, his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim should be dismissed (Berg v Albany Ladder Co., Inc., 10 NY3d 902, 904 [2008]). Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

According to plaintiff, an employee of nonparty Brooklyn Welding Corp., he was tasked with moving steel beams that had been brought to Harlem Hospital for construction of a new patient…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Narducci v. Manhasset Bay AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ayotte v. GervasioNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Ortiz v. Varsity Holdings, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API