Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Yankton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1989No. 16078PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Marlow Brown (Brown) claims his damages for wrongful discharge under the South Dakota Veteran’s Preference Statute (SDCL ch. 3-3) should be measured from date of dismissal rather than date of application for relief.

Facts

Brown was hired as a custodian by the City of Yankton (City) in mid-1979. He was employed by the City on an indefinite basis until his dismissal on July 16, 1985. 1 City knew that Brown was an honorably discharged veteran of the Korean Conflict, but failed to comply with SDCL 3-3-4 in dismissing Brown from his employment. 2

Brown brought suit against the City…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Girard Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Osterkamp v. Alkota Manufacturing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Johnson v. Village of CohassetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sorrels v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hanig v. City of WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Colton v. DeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API