Baecht v. Marsh Bros. & Gardenier, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.
The plaintiff and the intervener in an action for personal injuries appealed from a judgment of nonsuit, upon the ground that under the doctrine of last clear chance a question of fact within the exclusive province of the jury was presented.
The defendant and respondent operated small construction trains in a switch-yard of the intervener railway company, upon several easterly and westerly lines of track, as an independent contractor. The plaintiff was a welder of steel rails installed in said company’s tracks, as an employee of the latter. He had completed the inspection of his previous work…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Baker v. ShafterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Denver City Tramway Co. v. CobbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Hummer's Extx. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. Sacramento Northern RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942