Legal Opinion

Baecht v. Marsh Bros. & Gardenier, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1931No. Docket No. 6959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.

The plaintiff and the intervener in an action for personal injuries appealed from a judgment of nonsuit, upon the ground that under the doctrine of last clear chance a question of fact within the exclusive province of the jury was presented.

The defendant and respondent operated small construction trains in a switch-yard of the intervener railway company, upon several easterly and westerly lines of track, as an independent contractor. The plaintiff was a welder of steel rails installed in said company’s tracks, as an employee of the latter. He had completed the inspection of his previous work…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Baker v. ShafterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Denver City Tramway Co. v. CobbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hummer's Extx. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Sacramento Northern RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API