Isotalo v. Kelly Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15]
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Kelly Services, Inc.’s motion for partial summary judgment on Plaintiff John Isotalo’s federal and state age discrimination claims.1 (Dkt. 15.) Defendant moves for summary judgment on Plaintiffs claim arguing that Plaintiffs representations to the Social Security Administration that he was disabled and unable to work, and thereafter received and continues to receive SSA benefits, leaves Plaintiff unable to prove, or even allege, that he was qualified…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sanders v. Lincoln CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Wad v. Amazon Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020