First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO HEARSAY
WILLIAMS, Judge.
As in many Winstar cases, Plaintiff claims that the passage of the Federal Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) breached its contract with the Government because the Act prohibited it from treating goodwill as capital which counted toward its regulatory capital requirements and from meeting relaxed capital benchmarks. This Winstar ease departs from the mainstream somewhat in that Defendant claims Plaintiff committed a prior material breach of the contract by making loans to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edward Nekolny, Patrick Dumas, and Maria L. Dahms v. Ann B. Painter, Individually and as Supervisor of Lyons Township, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Kuenzle v. HTM Sport-Und Freizeitgeräte AGCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Ziegler Bolt and Parts Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- B & G Enterprises, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010