Legal Opinion

State v. Perez, Jr.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2019No. Docket 45351PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

Augustine Garnica Perez Jr. appeals from his judgment of conviction for felony DUI. He challenges the district court's decision denying his motion to suppress evidence gathered as a result of an investigatory stop. Specifically, he argues that the district court erred in concluding that information provided by a citizen during a call to dispatch was sufficient to create the reasonable, articulable suspicion necessary to justify the stop. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case arises from the district court's denial of Perez's motion to suppress evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. PurdumIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PylicanIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. MaahsIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. WhartonIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. PoppIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State v. MaahsIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API