Legal Opinion
Daniel Connaughton v. Harte Hanks Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1988No. 86-3170PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants challenge this Court to determine the limits of its responsibility to review a jury’s verdict against a publisher in this action for libel implicating important First Amendment issues pursuant to the dictates of the Supreme Court mandating appellate courts to conduct an independent examination of the entire record of the proceedings to ensure that the judgment does not pose a forbidden intrusion into First Amendment rights of free expression. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 499, 104 S.Ct. 1949, 1958, 80 L.Ed.2d 502…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ronald Newsom Hasan Sharif Eddie J. McMillan and Donald Wolverton v. Steve Norris, Commissioner Michael Dutton, Warden and David HindmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Anna Pleasant, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeffrey Pleasant, Deceased v. Michael Zamieski and City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- American Chemical Society v. Leadscope, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. Eddie Louis TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.