National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Transp. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
This is another of that large body of cases in which, though the grounds the employer gave for the discharge of an employee in fact existed, and in themselves were not unreasonable, the Board, taking into account as well the manner of the discharge and the background evidence showing union antipathy, has found that they were not the real reason but the pretext for the discharge. The question presented here then is whether, as respondent claims, the inference, that the reason given for the discharge was the real reason, was demanded, or whether, as the Board claims,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Riverside Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Oklahoma Transp. Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962