Legal Opinion
Posner v. Rockefeller
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrancis J. Bloustein, J.
In this article 78 proceeding petitioners, as citizens, taxpayers and Assemblymen of this State, seek an order in the nature of mandamus, directing respondents (the Governor, the Director of the Budget, and the Comptroller of the State of New York) to cease expending any further moneys in accordance with certain provisions of the State Purposes Budget, the Local Assistance Budget, the Capital Construction Budget, and the Supplemental Budget, adopted at the last (1969) session of the New York State Legislature. The budgets under attack are contained in chapters 48, 49, 50 and 340 of the Laws…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. TremaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Matter of Block v. SpragueNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Wilmerding v. La GuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Posner v. RockefellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Posner v. RockefellerNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- In re Dara L.New York City Family Court · 1973