Legal Opinion

Malcolm v. Malcolm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1956No. Docket 55, Calendar 46,662PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

We are asked in this case to grant full faith and credit to a Nevada divorce decree. That decree, entered July 11, 1947, in suit commenced by Mr. Malcolm, recites in appropriate language an adjudication by the court of dissolution of the bonds of matrimony between Mr. and Mrs. Malcolm, and it declares that they are “restored to the status of single persons.” The decree then proceeds:

“It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the care, custody and control of the minor children of this marriage, to-wit: Roseann Malcolm, age 17 years, and Gary Malcolm, age 10 years, be awarded to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Edelman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hudson v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Altman v. AltmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Snider v. SniderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Farnham v. FarnhamNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Owen v. OwenMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API