Legal Opinion

Hastie v. Alpine Orthopedics & Sports Medicine

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2015No. DA 15-0029PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Plaintiff David Hastie (Hastie) underwent foot surgery in October 2010. Defendant Dr. Mark Deibert (Deibert) of Alpine Orthopedics & Sports Medicine (Alpine) in Bozeman performed the surgery. Following the surgery, Dr. Deibert placed Hastie in an orthotic boot and asked him to return for post-operative care. After two post-operative appointments, Hastie did not return to Dr. Deibert’s office for a third appointment, but continued wearing the orthotic boot. Hastie wore the boot for almost three years, which resulted in foot, leg and back pain and difficulty walking. Hastie sued Dr. Deibert…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Albert v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Arnold v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. McClue v. Safeco InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Brookins Ex Rel. Gotcher v. MoteMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Zimmerman v. RobertsonMontana Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wicklund v. SundheimMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Wicklund v. SundheimMontana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API