Legal Opinion

Carolina Power & Light Co. v. 3M Co.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided November 17, 2011No. Civil Action Nos. 5:08-CV-460-FL, 5:08-CV-463-FLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*158ORDER

DAVID W. DANIEL, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Florida Power & Light Company’s (“FP & L”) motion to compel Plaintiffs’1 production of certain unredacted documents [CP & L DE-559; Consol DE-556]. Plaintiffs have responded [CP & L DE-567; Consol DE-563],2 and the motion is ripe for decision.

FP & L sought production of “all correspondence or communications between Plaintiffs and former Ward Employee.” Def.’s Mem., Ex. L at 3 ¶ 1 [DE-560-12], Plaintiffs responded that they would produce (1) non-privileged responsive documents and (2) privileged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re Martin Marietta Corporation, United States of America v. William C. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Thursday Special Grand Jury September Term, 1991. United States of America v. Under Seal Under Seal, and Under Seal Under Seal, in Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Thursday Special Grand Jury September Term, 1991. United States of America v. Under Seal Under Seal, and Under Seal Under SealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. The Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  5. Mainstreet Collection, Inc. v. Kirkland's, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deanna Brown-Thomas v. Tommie Rae HynieDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
  2. Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
  3. Revak v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API