Legal Opinion

Bagley v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 23, 1968No. 7875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant’s brief contains a statement of the nature of this case that appears so complete, fair and accurate that it is, with slight elision, adopted for the purposes of this opinion and quoted next:

“This is an appeal under Article 9.17 of the Texas Election Code, as amended, from the judgment upon a school consolidation election contest tried without a jury before the 115th Judicial District Court of Upshur County, Texas, and is based in part on the findings of fact filed by the Trial Court at the request of Appellants and in part upon the Statement of Facts filed herein. It alleges…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gayle v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Davis v. WalcottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Mitchell v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Vicars v. StokelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. City of Roma v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prado v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Goodman v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Holt v. TranthamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API