Alewine v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SHORES, Justice.
Plaintiff Henry Alewine’s automobile collided with a Southern Railway train. His wife Roxie, a passenger in his car, was killed; Henry was injured. He sued Southern Railway and other defendants, individually and as administrator of his wife’s estate, and is appealing from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for the defendants.
The sole issue presented is whether the trial court erred to reversal by refusing one of the plaintiff’s requested jury instructions. We affirm that portion of the judgment in favor of Southern Railway and against Henry Alewine, individually. We reverse…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Billy Ray Delancey v. Motichek Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Crigler v. SalacSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Grayco Resources, Inc. v. PooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Hosey v. Seibels Bruce Group, S.C. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Gardner v. DorseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barnett v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Edgeworth v. FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC & HEALTHSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006