People v. Orrante
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The principal question for our determination in this case is whether the defendant who was convicted below of murder in the second degree and who was at the time of the perpetration of said crime armed with a deadly weapon, is eligible for probation under the provisions of section 1203 of the Penal Code. We have concluded that she is not and that the trial court acted in excess of its jurisdiction in granting probation to her. We have also concluded that the pertinent orders of the court below are appeal-able by the People and we so review them without calling into play the extraordinary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. FlohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. SerratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. GainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.