Legal Opinion
Bush v. State, Department of Human Resources
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1996No. 26543PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1299OPINION
By the Court,
Shearing, J.:
This is an appeal from the district court’s order terminating the parental rights of natural parents, appellants Rosemary Emilie Bush (“Rosemary”) and her husband Alan Dean Bush (“Alan”), as to their children Alan Everett Bush (“Alan Everett”) and Frisco Lou Bush (“Frisco”). Rosemary and Alan are mentally challenged. Rosemary has an IQ of 65, Alan an IQ of 71. Their children are also mentally challenged and participate in specialized school programs.
In December, 1988, Clark County Juvenile Court Services received a physical abuse complaint concerning the Bush…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte State Dept. of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Glover v. ALA. DEPT. OF PENSIONS AND SEC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- In Re HickmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- In Re Interest of DLSNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vincent L. G. v. State Division of Child & Family Services, Department of Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Parental Rights as to QLRNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Matter of Parental Rights as to DRHNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Cooley v. STATE, DEPT. HUM. RES.Nevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Bush v. State, Department of Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.