Hamm v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California: Oscar A. Trippet, Judge. Edward Hamm was convicted of obstructing the recruiting and enlistment service of the United States, and brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
[1] The plaintiff in error was convicted and sentenced under the second count of an indictment which charged that he did on a date named “knowingly, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously obstruct the recruiting and enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service of the United States, by then and there peddling, issuing, selling, and offering for sale to various and divers persons, among others M. J. Meeker, the certain book entitled ‘The Finished Mystery,’ ” and containing the seditious and inflammatory statements and language which are set forth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Shilter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Rhuberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Stephens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- United States v. EastmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eugene W. Beadnell v. United States of America, Gary S. Clemens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Henderson v. BryanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Brown v. BernsteinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1943