Legal Opinion

Clerico v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 1995No. 94-01124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Alberto Clerieo III appeals the judgment and sentence imposed upon him after a jury found him guilty of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22, Florida Statutes (1993). Clerieo’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After reviewing the record, we see no error in regard to the conviction and therefore affirm the conviction. The court erred, however, in imposing $693 in costs without citing statutory authority for those costs. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We, accordingly,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API