Lanier v. Norfolk Southern Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
Michael B. Lanier appeals the district court’s order dismissing his case and asserts that the district court incorrectly found that no duty was owed to him under South Carolina tort law. Lanier also argues for the first time on appeal that jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) was improper. We find that jurisdiction was proper under CAFA and affirm the district court’s order.
I
On January 5, 2005, three employees of Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company (collectively referred to as “Norfolk”) took a local train to the Avondale Mills, Inc.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- James Brill, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Defendant-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Coffey v. Ripple Labs Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Honeycutt v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2008
- Albert v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Belt v. Amazon Home Warranty CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Dean v. SN Servicing CorpDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.