J.A.S. v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ANSTEAD, Justice.
We have for review the decision in State v. J.A.S., 686 So.2d 1366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We accepted jurisdiction to answer the following question certified to be of great public importance:
WHETHER THE POTENTIAL PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF SECTION 800.04, FLORIDA STATUTES, BY A MINOR UNDER THE AGE OF SIXTEEN FURTHERS A COMPELLING STATE INTEREST THROUGH THE LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS?
Id. at 1370. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed below, we answer the certified question in the affirmative, approve the decision under review, and hold that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel WageringSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Schmitt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- In re T.W.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- B.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- State v. RifeSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- State v. J.P.Supreme Court of Florida · 2004
- In re G.T.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Aid for Women v. FoulstonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.