Legal Opinion
Emsco Pavement Breaking Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1959No. Civ. 23988PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to quash the service of summons and complaint upon respondent and defendant, Anders-Jahre and Company.
A résumé of the facts is as follows:
In the latter part of 1957 appellant was engaged in the removal of the concrete piers of a certain bridge which was located across the entrance to the west basin of Los Angeles Harbor. On September 11 of that year, the vessel “Janus,” owned by respondent, attempted to enter the west basin while tied to and assisted by the tug “Long Beach.” The “Long Beach” was owned and operated by defendant, Wilmington…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Empire Steel Corp. of Texas, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Detsch & Co. v. Calbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Yeck Manufacturing Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- City of National City v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Sims v. National Engineering Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.