Mercier v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM DAY, Justice.
I. Introduction
A jury found Appellant Jeremy Phillip Mercier guilty of capital murder. Appellant appeals his conviction raising two points on appeal: 1) the trial court erred by denying Appellant’s motion for new trial when he presented newly discovered evidence of someone else confessing to the crime; and 2) the trial court erred by refusing to hear the recantation testimony of one of the State’s witnesses in Appellant’s motion for new trial. We affirm.
II. Facts
Appellant was a daycare aide at the Fun 4 Kids Daycare Center on January 25, 2000. According to his third…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- State v. HardyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Mallet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Rangel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Klapesky v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- State v. Lewis, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
- Lundgren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Byron Lawrence Graves v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Byron Lawrence Graves v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.