Legal Opinion
Wesley Taylor v. Richard K. Bowers, Carl Doerhoff, Kent Grewe, Maryland Butts, Helen Farr, Loren Stout
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1992No. 90-2539PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellants Richard K. Bowers, D.O., Kent Grewe, M.D., and Carl R. Doerhoff, M.D., each of whom is sued individually and in his official capacity as an employee of the Missouri Department of Corrections and Human Resources, appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment on appellee Wesley Taylor’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). On appeal, they allege: (1) they are entitled to summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity and (2) the eleventh amendment bars Taylor’s state law malpractice claims. We conclude…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Reynolds v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Nelson v. ShuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Daniel Scott v. Mary BensonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Meuir v. Greene County Jail EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Randle v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.