Legal Opinion

Voigt v. Carlson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1958No. 10547PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

Habeas Corpus proceedings were instituted by Bennie G. Voigt and wife, Flora Irene Voigt, joined by guardian ad litem for Bennie G. Voigt, a person of unsound mind, against George E. Carlson and wife Edna Carlson, for the custody of Timothy Voigt, a boy 3 years old. Answer was made by the Carlsons by way of cross action seeking to declare that Timothy Voigt was a dependent or neglected child within the meaning of Article 2330, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, and related statutes.

A trial was had and testimony heard by the Court and the child was declared to be a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. Gallagher v. DieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Stubblefield v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gaston v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Rosson v. De ArmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Martin v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API