Legal Opinion
Blair v. Massachusetts Department of Conservation & Recreation
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided October 31, 2006No. WOCV200600308APublished
1Opinion of the Court
Agnes, Peter W., J.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a civil action in which the plaintiffs, Clealand B. Blair and Nancy J. Blair, seek judicial review of the denial of a variance by the Department of Conservation and Recreation, and contend that the Massachusetts Watershed Management Act, G.L.c. 92A 1/2 and its regulations, 350 C.M.R. §§11.01-11.13, are unconstitutional in violation of Articles 10 and 49 of the Massachusetts Constitution.
The defendant, the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation, has filed a Motion to Dismiss the plaintiffs claims on the ground that those claims are…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.