State v. Howell
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Justice.
The appellant was convicted upon trial upon an indictment for assault and battery with intent to kill. He has appealed- upon exceptions which, it is said in the brief, raise the following questions:
1. Is there any evidence to convict the defendant under the facts and law in the case ?
2. Did the Court err in refusing the motion of the defendant for a new trial in holding that a harsh argument between counsel for the defendant and counsel assisting the Solicitor did not prevent the defendant from having a fair and impartial trial ?
There is no merit in either of the stated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- State v. McGillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- State v. MishoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- State v. RasorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCrary v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967