Legal Opinion

Smith v. A. D. Farmer Type Founding Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal "by plaintiff from Order of the General Term of the City .Court sustaining the defendant’s exceptions, reversing judgment directed in favor'of plaintiff, and ordering judgment absolute for the defendant and against the plaintiff personally for costs of the action.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

On January 29, 1887, an- indenture of lease was executed by Adaline L. Gregg, then of the city of Brooklyn, to Aaron D. Farmer and others, composing the firm of Farmer, Little & Co., of the premises known as Nos. 62 and 64 Gold street in the city of Hew York, for the term of ten years, from May 1, 1887, at the yearly rent of $3,600,.payable in eqnal monthly payments of .$291.67, each in advance. The lessees entered under the lease and occupied the premises until about July 6, 1892, when they Organized a corporation by the name of The" A. D. Farmer Type Founding- Company, the defendant herein.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hetzel v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Mellen v. . MellenNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Prentice v. . JanssenNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Sweeney v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Clift v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stebbens v. TurnerNew York Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API