Legal Opinion

Fanos v. Maersk Line, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 21, 2003No. CIV.A.G-02-119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KENT; District Judge.

Plaintiff Stavros E. Fanos (“Fanos” or “Plaintiff’) brings this claim for seamen’s wages and penalty wages under 46 U.S.C. § 10313 against Defendants Maersk Line, Ltd., Maersk Sealand, A.P. Moller Group, Maersk, Inc., Wilmington Trust, Expander Transport Corporation, Expediter Transport Corporation, Expresser Transport Corporation, Exporter Transport Corporation, and Extender Transport Corporation (collectively “Defendants”). On October 31, 2002, Plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Alakai (O.N. 1182234)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  2. White v. Waterman Steamship Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  3. Thibodeaux v. VAMOS OIL & GAS CO.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2008
  4. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API