Legal Opinion

San Tan Irrigation District v. Wells Fargo Bank

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 25, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 99-0091PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

¶ 1 Wells Fargo Bank appeals from the grant of summary judgment to San Tan Irrigation District on San Tan’s claim of conversion under Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code, Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 47-3420 (1997). Because the trial court erred in failing to consider the applicable statutory defenses asserted by Wells Fargo, we reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 San Tan’s conversion claim was based on Wells Fargo accepting for deposit checks that, while payable to San Tan, had a forged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maine Family Federal Credit Union v. Sun Life Assurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Swanson v. Safeco Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Berthot v. Security Pacific BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Halla v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. City of Phoenix v. Great Western Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank/First Citizens Bank v. Citizens & AssociatesTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gerber & Gerber, P.C. v. Regions BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Pierce v. MoletCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Belfance v. Huntington National Bank (In Re World Metal, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  5. Wells Fargo Bank Na v. Ferruggio Ins. Servs. of La Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API