Legal Opinion
City of Long Beach v. Allen
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 10, 1956No. Civ. No. 21243PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
By this appeal Cope, Hoyt, Smith, Wigney, Wombaeher and Wright, retired police officers of the city of Long Beach, seek to ascertain the effect on their pensions of the salary ordinances passed since their retirement.
At the time of their respective retirements each of these men had served more than 20 years in the police department and for more than one year in the promotional rank1 held by each at the time of retirement. Under section 187, subdivision 2, of the city charter, each was entitled upon retirement to receive a fluctuating pension based on the applicable percentage of the salary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Terry v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Gibson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
3Cited by10 opinions
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Bowers v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bates v. City of RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Bates v. City of RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.