Legal Opinion
Rand v. Simonds
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 22, 2006No. 04 CV 382 JDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DICLERICO, District Judge.
James E. Rand, proceeding pro se, has sued three present or former employees of the Merrimack County House of Corrections (the “MCHC”), alleging that they were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs during his prior detention in that facility. One of the defendants, Henry Simonds, has moved for summary judgment on the ground that Rand failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (“the PLRA”). Through separate motions, Simonds also seeks dismissal of Rand’s case (1) as a sanction for his…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parente v. Coyne-FagueDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2023
- Rand v. SimondsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006