Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Land

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 4, 1969No. Nos. 605, 606, Dockets 31181, 31182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMBARD, Chief Judge:

This appeal by the United States and cross-appeal by the defendants challenge that portion of the condemnation award rendered by the district court which is based on the “risk of vacancy” created upon the subject building by the unique short-term option aspect of the takings exercised by the government. The United States contends that there should be no award for the risk of vacancy factor, while defendants maintain that the award is insufficient.

We reverse, because we find that the risk of vacancy award of $555,833.33 far exceeds the actual economic loss suffered by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain LandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Certain LandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Improved Premises Located at the Northwest Corner of Irving Place & Sixteenth StreetDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API