Legal Opinion

State v. Bish

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2010No. 09 MA 145PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeGenaro, Judge.

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court and appellant’s brief. Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the August 11, 2009 decision of the Youngstown Municipal Court that suppressed the results of field sobriety and breathalyzer tests in the context of an operating-the-vehicle-under-the-influence (“OVI”) case against defendant-appellee, Julie Bish. On appeal, the state argues that contrary to the trial court’s ruling, it met its burden in establishing substantial compliance with the regulations pertaining to the breathalyzer…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. McNamaraOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. AldridgeOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. WatersOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Willowick v. OsborneOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Columbus v. HortonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. LopezOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API