Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Swanson v. Strickland

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 18, 1936Published

1DissentBrown, J.

(dissenting). — I think the purpose of Section 21 of Article III as amended was to require absolute compliance therewith, and that no longer should any presumption of the sufficiency, or the publication, of the notice be indulged merely because the legislative journals recited that proof had been “established in the Legislature.”

It clearly makes the validity of special and local legislation dependent upon such compliance, which compliance must be shown by journal entries. Board of Public In struction v. Brown, 114 Fla. 711, 154 So. 850; Milner v. Hatton, 100 Fla. 210, 129 So. 593. I do not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Douglas v. WebberSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Milner v. HattonSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Board of Public Instruction v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API