Legal Opinion

Eilert v. Turner

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 22, 2015No. Civil Action No. H-13-3758Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, alleging that pros se Defendant Charles I. Turner (“Turner”), a New Jersey attorney practicing primarily in debt collection, violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1602 et seq., in seeking to collect on three consumer debts purportedly owed by Plaintiff Glenn Eilert (“Eilert”), is Ei-lert’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings (instrument # 25).

After reviewing the record and the applicable law, for the reasons stated below the Court concludes that the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API