Eilert v. Turner
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, alleging that pros se Defendant Charles I. Turner (“Turner”), a New Jersey attorney practicing primarily in debt collection, violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1602 et seq., in seeking to collect on three consumer debts purportedly owed by Plaintiff Glenn Eilert (“Eilert”), is Ei-lert’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings (instrument # 25).
After reviewing the record and the applicable law, for the reasons stated below the Court concludes that the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.