Legal Opinion
Hikel v. Abousy
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 27, 1966No. Civ. No. 16182PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
At the pretrial conference in this case two matters were argued and submitted to the Court for ruling.(1) Plaintiff served on defendant, inter alia, the following interrogatory:
“8. Does the Defendant have within his possession or control, or does he have knowledge of any photographs, still or motion pictures relevant to the occurrence. (If the answer to this In*154terrogatory is in the affirmative, state whether they are still pictures or motion pictures, and the name and address of the person who has present possession of them.)”
Defendant replied as follows:
“8. The Defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Buffington v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Leszynski v. RussDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961
- Knighton v. Villian & Fassio e Compagnia Internazionale di Genova Societe Riuniti di NavigazioneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
- Buining v. the TransporterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Betty U. Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Dodson v. PersellSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- García Negrón v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1976
- Cabral v. ArrudaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
- Martin v. Long Island Rail RoadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.