Legal Opinion

Irvin v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1906PublishedCited by 20 opinions

This case was decided by Division B. Writ of error to the Criminal Court of Record for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated as defendant, was informed against, tried, convicted and sentenced for the crime of keeping and maintaining a gaming table, in the Criminal Court of Record for Hills-borough county, and seeks reversal here by writ of error. The third count of the information upon which the conviction was had, omitting its formal commencement,, is as follows: “That the said E. G. Irvin, alias Mose Irvin, whose Christian name to the Solicitor is unknown, late of the county of Hillsborough, aforesaid, on the thirteenth day of February, in the year of our Lord one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Polinsky v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  4. Webster v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  5. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bessie Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Griswold v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  3. Stedman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. Delmonico v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  5. Channell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API