D. R.-T. v. O. M.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentMann, Judge
A California man begets a California child by a California woman, is declared by a California court to be the child’s father and required by California law to support the child until he reaches twenty-one. The California man, then a young resident in a hospital, moves to Florida, where he practices medicine successfully. My brethren think that this absolves him of the duty to support the child after he becomes eighteen, a conclusion I could share if he had, as a Floridian, sired a Florida child by a Florida mother. A preference for the law of the forum which takes the single contact with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.