Legal Opinion
In re Church Const. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 3, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On motion to vacate receivership.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
The motion to vacate the receivership is granted, but not upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction in this court. Admitting the truth of all the statements concerning the-nature of the construction company’s business, made either in the petition or at bar, I remain of the opinion expressed in Re Rutland Realty Company (D. C.) 157 Fed. 296, that one who makes something for profit is a manufacturer of that something, and that it makes no difference wheth- ■ er the thing so made or manufactured is affixed to the realty or a part of the realty, or a mere chattel. The same…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re LacovCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- In re Rutland Realty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re New York Tunnel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Atlas Copco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- In re Kingston Realty Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1907